Here are practical scenarios you face in ETL/DataStage projects:
Scenario 1: Dimension Lookup (Fast Lookup Needed)
Input: Fact file of 10M rows
Reference: Customer Dimension = 50K rows
Use Lookup
Customer dimension is small → easy to cache
Minimal overhead → very fast
Ideal when the reference doesn't change frequently
➡️ Performance Impact:
Lookup can process 10M rows in minutes because the 50K dimension is held in memory.
Scenario 2: Large-to-Large Data Merge
Input: Sales Fact = 80M rows
Reference: Product Master = 50M rows
� Use Join
Both datasets are large
Lookup is not feasible (memory heavy, slow)
Join distributes data across nodes (parallel processing)
➡️ Performance Impact:
Join will handle partitioning and load balancing → significantly faster for heavy volumes.
Scenario 3: Reference Table Changes Every Day
Input: Daily transaction file
Reference: Daily price list (variable but large)
� Use Join
Reference data changes often
Caching daily large tables is inefficient
Join avoids cache rebuilding overhead
❌ When Lookup Fails or Causes Slowness
Reference table > 1–2 million rows
Memory constraints on ETL server
Multiple lookups in a single job
Lookup key not selective
Lookup on unsorted huge data → long load time
�Special Case: Sparse Lookup (DataStage)
Used when:
Reference data is in a database table
Input is small
Each record hits DB for a lookup
Example: Validate a handful of customer IDs from a DB table
� Good for real-time or selective validation, but bad for large datasets (too many DB hits).
� Quick Decision Guide
Condition | Best Option |
Small reference, large input | Lookup |
Both datasets are large | Join |
Reference is in DB and input is small | Sparse Lookup |
Need full outer join | Join |
Need reject records for failed matches | Lookup |
Complex join conditions | Join |
No comments:
Post a Comment